|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01587nam a2200541 i 4500 |
| 007 |
ta |
| 040 |
|
|
|a Universidad Nacional Agraria
|b spa
|
| 907 |
|
|
|a H10
|
| 911 |
|
|
|a M
|
| 978 |
|
|
|a EMF
|
| 979 |
|
|
|a 29-01-0001
|
| 980 |
|
|
|a MDR
|
| 981 |
|
|
|a 12-09-2013
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a DOC
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a TESIS
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a UNA
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a FAGRO
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a ENLINEA
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a tad12913
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a 011774
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a spa
|
| 092 |
|
|
|a T N H10 D352
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Delgado Castillo, C.M.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Pichardo Guido, S. Asesor
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Munguia Hernandez, R. Asesor
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluación de pesticidas y NIM contra la pudrición de la vaina de la pitahaya (Hylocereus undatus, Britt et Rose) causada por Dothiorela sp. bajo dos condiciones ambientales en vivero
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a Managua (Nicaragua) :
|b ,
|c 1999
|
| 264 |
|
|
|a Managua (Nicaragua) :
|b ,
|c 1999
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 36 p.
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Ilus.; 18 ref.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Sumario (Es)
|
| 502 |
|
|
|a Tesis (Ing Agr)
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a HYLOCEREUS UNDATUS
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a PLAGUICIDAS
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a PODREDUMBRES
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a EVALUACION
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a EXPERIMENTACION
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a BROTACION
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a FACTORES AMBIENTALES
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a NICARAGUA
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a NIM
|
| 653 |
|
|
|a PITAHAYA
|
| 856 |
|
|
|u https://cenida.una.edu.ni/Tesis/tnh10d352.pdf
|
| 942 |
|
|
|c BK
|2 agris
|
| 952 |
|
|
|a 01
|b 01
|8 CG
|c CG
|y BK
|p D0003/01c01
|o T N H10 D352
|
| 952 |
|
|
|a 01
|b 01
|8 CG
|c CG
|y BK
|p D0004/01c02
|o T N H10 D352
|
| 952 |
|
|
|a 01
|b 01
|8 CG
|c CG
|y BK
|p D2986/04c03
|o T N H10 D352
|
| 952 |
|
|
|a 01
|b 01
|8 CG
|c CG
|y BK
|p D2987/04c04
|o T N H10 D352
|